online pdf Women Scientists in America Struggles and Strategies to 1940 Women Scientists in America AUTHOR Margaret W. Rossiter – gh4crew.co.uk
Extremely interesting subject matter and full of fascinating anecdotes but also so chock full of dates and statistics that it feels sort of like reading a textbook so it s a bit hard to get through And every time I tried skimming for A Synopsis This book is an analysis of women s participation in American science It examines major and minor women in science education and employment patterns women s achievements in science and the type of recognition given and withheld to women In general this is a history of an occupational group whose status has risen and fallen over time A second volume will cover the post 1940 years B Why did women have a subordinate invisible place in science 1 Women have traditionally had a subordinate place in science The result has been that they have been hidden from historians This resulted from an intentional camouflage placed over the contributions of women in the late 19th This invisibility was related to two trends in US history from 1820 to 1920 the increase in the number of middle class women attending higher education and the growth bureaucratization and professionalization of science and technology in America These educated women were expected to participate in emotional soft noncompetitive nurturing womanly The new science was seen as competitive
rational impersonal mascul. In volume one of this landmark study focusing developments up to 1940 Margaret impersonal mascul. In volume
"ONE OF THIS LANDMARK STUDY FOCUSING "of this landmark study focusing developments up to 1940 Margaret describes the activities and personalities of the numerous women scientists as.
Read æ PDF, DOC, TXT or eBook ↠ Margaret W. RossiterK social philanthropy reading circles and very limited scientific clubs3 1880 1910 Women changed their freetime activities to include museum work observatories and scientific organizations This
Resulted In A Major Confrontationin a major confrontation the men The professionalization of science can then be seen as a reaction against the feminist incursion into their work Women were only allowed to hold lower subordinate positions 4 After 1910 Women had thus opened the doors of science but had great difficulty stepping into the room Some of the #Extraordinary Women Developed A #women developed a many strategies to overcome this situation One was by taking an idealistic position against all work stereotypes They argued for full euality and wrote letters documenting unfair work practices The greatest triumph here was by Christine Ladd Franklin who opened graduate schools to women and allowed them to attain the same doctorates as men A second strategy was conservative This was an acceptance of the stereotyped roles but using them as establishing areas of women work They argued that women had uniue skills that ualified them for particular tasks 5 By 1940 the first strategy had failed and the second strategy took hold Despite the thousands of women employed in scientific obs this growth was achieved at the price of segregated employment and underrecognition. En's efforts to establish themselves as members of the scientific community and examines the forces that inhibited their active
"AND VISIBLE PARTICIPATION IN THE SCIENCES. "visible participation in the sciences. ,
Ine and unemotional Thus a woman scientist was an oxymoron a contradiction and
Therefore Was Unlikely To Existwas unlikely to exist Chronology of the emergence of women and the emergence of science1 There were three general periods the first before 1880 the second from 1880 to 1910 and finally after 1910 Of these the period from 1880 to 1910 is the most important for it was then that acceptable conditions for women s presence in science was worked out This chronology does not fit with traditional history economic presidential or even the history of science revolutions Instead it is based upon social opportunities from women Before 1910 they were achieved gains in the scientific workplace After 1910 the workplace became rigid and the women were less able to gain new ground D Education employment and recognition1 Neither higher education nor good work did not necessarily lead to obs Outstanding women were rarely recognized and even if they were it was only in their obituaries The main point is that universities became far willing to educate women in science than to employ them or grant them any recognition 2 Pre 1880 Education was considered important because women would be raising sons and an intelligent mother would provide a better background for the child Before 1880 women who went to college spent their free time doing religious wor. Tronomers chemists biologists and psychologists who overcame extraordinary obstacles to contribute to the growth of American science This remarkable history recounts wom. .